The Newly Leaked Secret to Reserach Essay Samples Uncovered

The Newly Leaked Secret to Reserach Essay Samples Uncovered Nanomanufacturing doesn't always have the capability to access the caliber of their merchandise within the shortest time possible. The data demonstrates that the overall public in Hong Kong doesn't have an extremely substantial comprehension of the piracy actions in the Indian ocean. To be sure the efficiency of a business, it's required to conduct your own research. For instance, a business should devise a business plan so they may be in a position to foresee their company objectives, and the methods which need to be completed in accomplishing each of their smart objectives. What Is So Fascinating About Reserach Essay Samples? The essay will test the student wisdom and ability in answering the questions and analyzing the matter. An academic essay always must be relevant. Your academic essay should evoke an emotion that is needed to spark different ideas, opinions and other types of responses. Always keep in mind that it should be playful it must not bore your audience. If you would like to make an academic essay that's both outstanding and relevant, always place the items that we've discussed above in mind. Fortunately, there are now lots of resources available that make resume writing much simpler. There's quite a few essays completed by them. The very first step you will want to assume is that your topic will probably be too broad, in other words, it will require that you deal with an excessive amount of information for a single essay. If you get a crystal clear essay, readers will understand easily what you wish to tell. The readers wish to read an essay that's totally free from any mistakes so it will be simple to comprehend. The topic is quite intriguing. Research Paper isn't a task for a single day. With research plans, researchers will be in a position to foresee the things that may fail and plan for the crucial actions in managing such things. The researchers will likewise be able to craft a timeline for the length of their research and allocate their time properly. When doing a research, most researchers plan for the entire path of their research as a way to prevent circumstances that might negatively impact their research. Ensure you use a mix of literature instead of only internet sources. Even if you're a specialist in a particular field, don't be afraid to use and cite external sources. It is imperative to conduct an exhaustive research to make sure the offers are genuine and not merely flowery words to pull customers. Keep in mind that if you analyze your paper, your principal task is to make certain your audience understands the important points without a lot of difficulty. As a result, though selecting the right methodology that works for your assignment is vital. So basically, if you would like your investigating to go smoothly without sacrificing much time and resources, you have to have a research program. The secret to successful research is to realize the underlying methodologies, to pick the ideal tool for an undertaking. Reserach Essay Samples: No Longer a Mystery It's not quite as easy as writing an essay about your summer vacation, your loved ones, or the previous party you've been to, as you don't need to do research to figure out about your personal experience. Within the body, you should have three to four ideas. If you've done something special to acquire your information, you definitely have to mention it. It's recommended that you just pick the topic that you're able to de al with, for instance, if you're not t sketching the personality characteristics then you ought to better not elect for it.

Research Paper Topics Directly Related to Special Education Legislation

Research Paper Topics Directly Related to Special Education LegislationWhen preparing a research paper, one of the best ways to research the topic is to conduct research on specific legislation which pertains to a specific topic. This can be through searching the legislative website, the official websites for the Congressional committees responsible for researching legislation and programs and research funding, as well as looking in school libraries.In the early days of research, the focus was more on reviewing and obtaining information about the latest updates in legislation and new legislation. Now, it is more about researching legislation related to special education law. One reason is because legislation changes frequently, and those who seek reform on a specific topic will also update legislation periodically.The job of researchers now is to identify the specific legislation relevant to a specific topic. Some researchers may conduct a search on their own, but in most cases they should contact their elected representatives. This can involve contacting members of Congress or staff members for their staffs and ask them if they know of any new legislation relevant to the study area.There are many governmental agencies which have research grants specifically aimed at assisting students in getting research paper topics directly related to special education legislation. It is important to remember that although the government may be funded to help pay for research, there are still some laws which do not apply directly to children with disabilities.Researchers should understand this, as the basic purpose of research paper topics which pertain to special education legislation is to help students, parents and educators to develop new ideas that will make children succeed. Once they have an idea in mind, they should go about research paper preparation to identify the proper keywords to use.Researching through keyword research and how to find legislation is still the best approach to take in the early stages of creating research papers. Nowadays, even state offices may be able to provide their constituents with information pertaining to new legislation that has been introduced in the previous year.The more focused a research paper topics is, the better the results will be when it is time to submit the research paper to a college or university. Research paper topics which do not focus too much on the legislation itself, but rather on the end result, such as achievement in special education programs, will produce less-than-desirable results.The keywords chosen to be used for research paper topics which pertain to special education legislation should relate to the subject matter of the paper and should give a concrete picture of the effects the legislation is having on the subject. And finally, research paper topics which pertain to legislation which applies directly to the subject of the research paper is probably best.

The Hidden Facts on Free College Essay Title

The Hidden Facts on Free College Essay Title Some students search for term papers for free so they can use samples of term papers to make their own documents. Many students search for a totally free research paper they can use as their own assignment draft or example of suitable form and fashion. Other students may use totally free term papers so as to learn about the content which should be included in their very own document. They may need free research papers so that they can use the reports as drafts of their own documents. Getting the Best Free College Essay Title An absolutely free essay is one that a student obtains without needing to pay for it. There are lots of reasons why a student might need to reference a free essays'' term paper for a training course. As soon as you discover that topic, it's about writing and rewriting. To put it differently, you first must choose topic for your paper. Reading absolutely free essays may give students realistic goals about the sort of writing they are able to aim for in the brief term. It is crucial for new writers to read student texts so they can establish the caliber of essay to which they need to aspire. Many famed quotes exist about the subject of literacy. Catchy essay title arrests the eye of readers It is among the prerequisites in rubrics, and GED essays, to put it differently, ability to pick a god essay topic can make a student additional marks. The Characteristics of Free College Essay Title From time to time, the essay title page is an essential element of the impression made through an academic paper. Students ought to be aware that essay cover page means the same thing as title page. Every essay needs to have a list of materials utilised in the text. Browsing our essay writing samples can offer you a good idea whether the standard of our essays is the quality you're looking for. As soon as it's extremely valu able to read professional-level writing, it may also lead students to mistakenly feel their writing won't ever be good enough for a thriving project. Writing of a fine thesis title page is simple, however, there are lots of students who forget about it as they concentrate on the research paper itself. Students may need to compose reports for any subject they're taking in school. They also use free thesis examples for many reasons. They often use free dissertations in order to understand the basic format. They may wish to have a custom-written report instead, as it will not be duplicated anywhere else. Your readers have to be grabbed by your title and to understand they will read something interesting. Furthermore, your title may appear ridiculous in the event the audience doesn't understand your clever allusion. Before you commence writing a title for your essay, it's always helpful to find out more about qualities which every headline should have. The Unusual Secret of Free College Essay Title Bridget's essay is quite strong, but there continue to be a couple little things that could be made better. It's only normal to be anxious about hiring an on-line essay writer since you can not ever be sure whether you are employing the correct service or not. You don't need to get a story that's one in a million. Everybody's story differs. There are a large selection of resources online where students can find term papers free of charge. In other instances, a totally free term paper on the internet is provided as an instance of a professional writing service's work so as to encourage seekers of term papers to employ the provider's services. For students to discover the resources that are suitable for them, they should determine the reason why they need to have a term paper free of charge and what they will use it for. Most students think that it is the lack of desire to complete assignments that results in the using of writing services. Who Else Wants to Learn About Free College Essay Title? It is possible to mix and match the provided titles to make something unique, yet still not need to be concerned about whether you've managed to adhere to the rules. In fact, the majority of authors never begin with the title. Generally, there are not any concrete rules for titles. There aren't any clear rules about how to create a very good title. Frequently, paper titles play an outstanding part in essay evaluation. Students must also make certain that the absolutely free essays and term papers they reference are not merely accurate, but also well-written. Once you are finished with your essay, you can begin brainstorming for ideas. If it's still true that you couldn't write great essays, you can view completely free essay papers online. Meanwhile, thesis statement indicates the goal of an essay. Ensure you state essay topic that has to be laconic but still informative. Stephen's essay is rather effective. A well-written essay is good.

How to Make the Most of Your Argument Essay Sample

How to Make the Most of Your Argument Essay SampleA Gmat argument essay sample is an example of what can be expected to be used in the course when you study this type of course at university. This is what students are taught when they enroll in this course to try and find out what they can do for themselves, but the challenge is that they are rarely given a taste of how effective an argument will be.Students will be able to prepare a response to the examples given in the lesson they learn from. They will get to see how effective this type of writing is and what methods of presentation and reasoning they can use in their own writing work. There is usually a short time period during which they will be allowed to rewrite and proofread the article after they have gotten their assignment done.The first thing students will need to do is to purchase a good quality argument essay sample. It can be found in many places online, or they may have it delivered to them as part of the class materia l they are given in order to help them get ready for the actual writing they will be doing. However, before this is done, the student should make sure that they know how to best present the piece.This is often the area where students fall short and just get confused about the subject matter. They may find that they just put their ideas down without ever making an argument. The author of the article should have a way of making an argument out of their writing and it is important that the students learn how to do this in order to make the pieces they create better.All they need to do is look for ways to make the argument stand out. They may use visualization techniques that make the words flow together, or they may choose to talk about how their position is true, or they may choose to talk about their strengths, or how it is a weakness for their opponent to argue against it.These are all very effective ways of using visualization techniques in order to get people to think about an arg ument they did not necessarily intend to use, but they have used it in order to draw their attention to such examples. It is a way of making the piece more interesting and engaging. The more people pay attention to an argument that you are talking about, the better the piece will end up being.The author of the article may have prepared a section on each of the arguments in the article and then found a common thread through all of them. It is a way of getting attention to a key point within the essay, and they will find that when they learn to draw attention to their points, they are more likely to find their points to be very persuasive.There are many uses for a Gmat argument essay sample, and it is important that the student who gets it is able to use it well in order to make the piece more powerful. This will require some practice and patience on the part of the student, but the writing work will also be made much easier because of the ability to point out some key points when the time comes. Once the student has learned how to make an argument, they will be much better equipped to figure out how to make it successful when it comes time to write the final article and finally submit it for evaluation.

Project Failure Deepwater Horizon and the Bp Oil Spill Essay Example

Project Failure: Deepwater Horizon and the Bp Oil Spill Essay Introduction The Deepwater Horizon rig sank on April 22, 2010, two days after the Macondo well blowout and explosion that killed 11 workers. The Deepwater Horizon accident, also known as the BP Oil Spill, was a project failure of immense proportions. It went from an oil exploration â€Å"project† to a massive program with portfolios of projects related to dealing with the families of those killed on the oil rig, stopping the oil leak, capturing the oil (from the well and from the ocean), cleaning the environment (seashores, wetlands, Gulf of Mexico), saving and cleaning wildlife (underwater and on shores), responding to human needs (fishermen, economically impacted families), dealing with the public (PR campaigns), dealing with shareholders and employees, and dealing with governments(state and federal). The mission and scope changed and grew significantly over night. It changed from a $500 million oil prospect development project to over a $100 billion program with global reach and hundreds of projects. In addition, the inability of BP to stop the flow in a timely manner, communication problems by BP management, and long lasting negative media coverage of the slow reaction to the spill have resulted in serious negative consequences for BP, subcontractors on the project and the oil exploration industry as a whole. Additionally, the US federal government responded to the accident with poor organization and leadership. We will write a custom essay sample on Project Failure: Deepwater Horizon and the Bp Oil Spill specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Project Failure: Deepwater Horizon and the Bp Oil Spill specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Project Failure: Deepwater Horizon and the Bp Oil Spill specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Analyzing the chain of events, some of the lessons from the failure become very apparent including the facts that BP and Transocean risk management plans were inadequate, BP was not prepared for the accident (or any accident for the most part), project management mistakes were made during drilling of the well, communication blunders were made by BP executives following the accident, the impact on the environment and stakeholders were underestimated, and the future of a company can be at risk from a critical failure of this magnitude. The DeepWater incident was largely a result of poor initial project planning, inadequate project risk management, poor project management execution including decision making and communication, and unprepared crisis management on the part of BP and the US government in the event of project failure. This paper will analyze the series of events leading up to the April 20, 2011, disaster, the decisions and lack of actions which compounded the possibility and severity of project failure and the mishandling of the crisis that ensued after the failure of the well. Background On March 19, 2008, BP acquired the federal lease for Mississippi Canyon Block 252, located in 4,992 feet of water 50 miles southeast of Venice, Louisiana for just over $34 Million from the Minerals Management Service (MMS). BP was highly confident in the seismic data and the presence of oil that the company proceeded to implement the project of drilling a $100 Million well named, Macondo. BP hired Transocean to supply the crew and the oil drilling rig to drill the well. On October 7, 2009, drilling began on the Macondo well using Transocean’s Marianas semisubmersible oil rig. The Marianas operated to a depth of 4,023 feet below the mudline, or 9,000 feet below sea level before it was damaged on November 9, 2009, by Hurricane Ida. Work on the Macondo well was suspended until January 31, 2010, when the Deepwater Horizon rig was delivered to the site. The Deepwater Horizon was a 33,000 ton semisubmersible oil rig which was controlled by a satellite guided dynamic positioning system and had a series of thrusters to keep it afloat. The Deepwater rig was extremely technologically advanced and viewed by many in the oil industry as having superior technology that was foolproof to error. On February 8, 2010, the Deepwater crew placed a blowout preventer on the well in 5,067 feet of water and used remotely operated vehicles to guide the preventer to the latching collet on the well head using video feeds. Once the preventer was latched up, the riser was hung in the tensioning system, the other necessary lines were hung, and the drilling commenced on the well. Research now shows that over the ensuing next three months, the Macondo well had multiple incidents of trouble which continued until the disastrous day when the well blew out and went out of control. During the early drilling in shallow depths, the crew experienced multiple well problems, gas kicks, and dangerous lost circulation zones-sometimes all at once. On four occasions prior to the blowout, the crew experienced well-control events. During one of the well-control problems, a drill pipe became stuck and could not move in or out of the hole. A stuck pipe can be very dangerous and is indicative of poor well hole conditions. After fighting the stuck pipe for a week, the crew separated the pipe from the assembly and placed a cement cap plug on it and continued to drill a sidetrack hole at 17,500 feet. As the days wore on, the crew became wary after experiencing multiple kicks, lost circulation, and stuck pipe to the point that Mike Williams testified to the Joint Investigation Committee in July 2010 that the crew had been calling it the â€Å"Well from Hell†. (In Too Deep pg25) After weeks of battling the well, the well reached its total depth of over 18,200 feet and the engineers ran measurements to analyze the subsurface intervals, their content, and their pressures. These measurements were used to make the decision to run pipe to the bottom of the well and to prepare the well for temporary abandonment prior to production. At this point, the engineers may have made a mistake which contributed to the well blow out. BP engineers decided to run one long string of casing from the bottom of the well all the way to the wellhead. This decision resulted in the only protection provided for the flow of oil and gas in to the wellbore was the cement that would be pumped down the casing and capped with a seal assembly at the well head. If the cement failed, the oil and gas could travel up the pipe to the well head and escape uncontrolled. BP chose a cementing design which had one avenue of protection through a single cap as opposed to other designs that had multiple layers cementing and caps which provided additional protection in case of well failure. By choosing this single cap well design, the BP engineers knowingly chose a less safe design and their managers willingly approved the decision. Haliburton was the cementing servicing company hired by BP to cement the well and attach the seal assembly to cap off the well until a new rig was connected to initial actual oil production. Haliburton supplied the cement used in the sealing of the well which is now known to have been of inferior quality. According to the BP team’s plan, if the cementing went smoothly, Haliburton could skip a scheduled cement evaluation. Planning The project plan for the Macondo well should have been one unique to the well itself. The research of the Deepwater incident indicates that the plan for the well was changed on multiple occasions and management seemed to be influencing decisions based on financial and schedule implications rather that the risk implications the decisions might present. Additionally, the lack of a clear project plan resulted in a poor organizational structure and accountability of the multiple subcontractors involved with the project. There were numerous occasions in which the crew of the Deepwater which was comprised of employees from BP, Transocean and Haliburton were unsure of which company was in charge at different points of the project. The lack of planning was even more evident within the issues of the inadequate risk planning and the execution problems that contributed to the failure of the project. As a result of the failure, a disaster comprised of death and monumental environmental damage was poorly addressed in that crisis management planning had not been addressed in the planning for the project as well. The crisis to contain the well itself would have been more readily addressed by BP had the company anticipated a blowout as a possible risk and therefore had a crisis management plan which had been communicated to all of its crew members. Instead the crisis itself is a First, on April 20, the oil and gas industry was unprepared to respond to a deepwater blowout, and the federal government was similarly unprepared to provide meaningful supervision. Second, in a compressed timeframe, BP was able to design, build, and use new containment technologies, while the federal government was able to develop effective oversight capacity. Both industry and government must build on knowledge acquired during the Deepwater Horizon spill to ensure that such a failure of planning does not recur Planning is even more important during a crisis. Such projects can be described as turnaround projects, where every minute is critical. Turnaround projects are often planned for months in advance, scheduled in minutes, with a well defined set of actions which are constantly monitored, and everyone prepared in advance for everything they need to do. BP and its subcontractors did not use their initial planning to develop disaster response or recovery plans. Without this type of planning built into the initial framework, time and lives can be lost when a company is forced to react to a disaster such as the Deepwater. ttp://www. oilspillcommission. gov/sites/default/files/documents/C21462-408_CCR_for_web_0. pdf Execution Failure The lack of a clear, unique plan for the Macondo project exacerbated the likelihood of problems during the execution of the drilling of the well. Additionally, Deepwater rig had several players involved with the project which resulted in a complex interrelationship among several companies all of whom had differ ent roles and conflicting interpretations of their accountability and responsibilities. Transocean was the owner and responsible for running the rig. Haliburton was a servicing subcontractor who was responsible for cementing the well. BP was lease owner and operator of the Macondo well and in that capacity had both the overall responsibility for everything that went on including promoting a culture of safety on the rig. BP’s safety culture failed on the night of April 20, 2010, as reflected in the actions of BP personnel on- and offshore and in the actions of BP’s contractors Research prior to April 20 shows that most crew members felt that safety was not a priority for BP or any of the other contractors on the rig. A survey during the second week of March showed that 46 percent of crew members surveyed felt that crewmembers feared reprisals for reporting unsafe situations and 15 percent felt that there were not always enough people available to carry out work safely. This extensive involvement of these contractors underscored the compelling need for BP to properly communicate a clear decision making process as well as emphasize safety. This poor safety culture was also evident in the meeting the day before the Deepwater accident in which the Transocean managers discussed with their BP counterparts the backlog of rig maintenance. A September 2009 BP safety audit had produced a 30-page list of 390 items requiring 3,545 man-hours of work. The lack of a safety culture may have contributed to the fact that BP, Halliburton, and Transocean did not adequately identify or address risks of an accident—not in the well design, cementing, or temporary abandonment procedures. Their management systems were marked by poor communications among BP, Transocean, and Halliburton employees regarding the risks associated with decisions being made. The decision making process on the rig was excessively compartmentalized, so individuals on the rig frequently made critical decisions without fully appreciating just how essential the decisions were to well safety—singly and in combination. As a result, officials made a series of decisions that saved BP, Halliburton, and Transocean time and money—but without full appreciation of the associated risks. There were several causes for execution failure that were identified after the accident. First, the cement that BP and Halliburton pumped into to the bottom of the well did not seal off hydrocarbons in the well. This was caused by the engineers changing the plans for the cement job during the effort due to drilling complications that were encountered. As a result, the engineers approved a lower volume of cement to be used in the process. This lower amount of cement resulted in the well not being sealed with a proper amount of cement weight. Second, the cement slurry used in the sealing of the well was poorly designed. Halliburton’s own internal tests showed that the cement mixture was unstable but the company still used the mixture on the Deepwater well. Lastly, the temporary abandonment procedures for the well were finalized at the last minute by BP and required the crew to severely underbalance the well before installing any additional barriers to back up the cement job. Risk Management BP failed to analyze the risk possibilities and plan risk mitigation strategies for the Macondo project. This lack of risk planning and mitigation can be attributed to several factors including: a bias in the oil industry itself which dismissed the possibility of a disaster as monumental as the Deepwater Horizon, a BP management culture which stressed cost savings and time savings in decision making, and a lack of a detailed crisis management plan in an industry whose failures can be monumental. Risk Management and the Oil Industry Bias The Deepwater incident has resulted in a dramatic reassessment of the risks associated with offshore drilling. Before April 20, many in the oil industry felt that drilling was safer in deep than in shallow waters. Since deepwater rigs worked farther off the coast, it would take longer for spilt oil to reach shore, giving more time for intervention to protect the coast. Also, the companies working in the deeper waters were typically the â€Å"big guys† of the oil industry who could afford to utilize more advanced technologies than the smaller firms working near the coast. Therefore, many believed that these companies were more adept at handling challenging conditions with the more technologically advanced equipment. Additionally, there had been no major well blowouts in federal offshore waters since 1970, which made the chances of another one seem remote. Another problem for appropriate risk assessment was the failure to adequately consider published data on recurring problems in offshore drilling. This included powerful â€Å"kicks† of unexpected pressures that sometimes led to a loss of well control, failing blowout preventer systems, and the drilling of relief wells. These problems occurred rarely and were of minor consequence relative to the number of wells in the world. However, these issues demonstrated that wells do not perform in a flawless manner and must be assessed for in risk planning. Additionally, working in the deeper depths of the ocean posed a numerous problems after a loss of well control or a blow out due to failure of the blow out preventer. Before the Deepwater accident, little attention was devoted to containment of a blown out well in the deepwater, largely because its occurrence was considered so unlikely. Therefore, many of the same technologies used for the blow out preventers in shallow water drilling were used in deepwater drilling with little innovation. That is despite the fact that containment problems become much more challenging and real-time decisions become more difficult when working in extreme depths of the ocean. Connecting and maintaining blowout preventers thousands of feet beneath the surface can only be performed by remote-operating vehicles. â€Å"A 2007 article in Drilling Contractor described how blowout preventer requirements got tougher as drilling went deeper, because of low temperatures and high pressures at the ocean bottom. The author discussed taking advantage of advances in metallurgy to use higher-strength materials in the blowout preventers’ ram connecting rods or ram-shafts. More generally, he suggested â€Å"some fundamental paradigm shifts† were needed across a broad range of blowout-preventer technologies to deal with deepwater conditions. † Page 51 pres book All things considered, the oil industry itself was overconfident and somewhat negligent in assessing the need for comprehensive and detailed risk management planning that addressed all facets of possibilities of failure within an oil well. Instead, the industry disregarded many of the possibilities as impossibilities despite the contrary research. This widespread view among the oil industry was reflected in the culture of the BP management and may have influenced some of appeasement with the lack of planning on the Macondo project. Risk Management and Decision Making BP had a tarnished reputation for safety. Among other BP accidents, 15 workers died in a 2005 explosion at its Texas City, Texas, refinery. In 2006, there was a major oil spill from a badly corroded BP pipeline in Alaska. As of April 20, BP and the Macondo well were almost six weeks behind schedule and more than $58 million over budget. BP did not adequately identify or address risks created by last-minute changes to well design and procedures. BP changed its plans repeatedly and up to the very last minute, sometimes causing confusion and frustration among BP employees and rig personnel. ? When BP did send instructions and procedures to rig personnel, it often provided inadequate detail and guidance. ? It is common in the offshore oil industry to focus on increasing efficiency to save rig time and associated costs. But management processes must ensure that measures taken to save time and reduce costs do not adversely affect overall risk. BP‘s management processes did not do so. ? Halliburton appears to have done little to supervise the work of its key cementing personnel and does not appear to have meaningfully reviewed data that should have prompted it to redesign the Macondo cement slurry. ? Transocean did not adequately train its employees in emergency procedures and kick detection, and did not inform them of crucial lessons learned from a similar and recent near-miss drilling incident When the BP engineers were faced with making a decision on the well design, they chose a design with one preventative layer. If the engineers would have put more credence into the high risks associated with deep well drilling, they may have picked a design which encompassed risk mitigation of several layers which prepared for failure. Additionally, by not really putting credence into the possibility of a well blowout, the engineers and BP management negated risk planning for the possibility of the environmental amage which could be caused by such a sizeable well having a blowout. In a case of an uncontrolled blowout, large volumes of oil and gas would be uncontrollably spewed into the environment. Transocean, for instance, was a major contractor for the Macondo well and is the world’s largest operator of offshore oil rigs, including the Deepwater Horizon; Transocean personnel made up the largest number of crew members on the rig at the time of the accident, and 9 of the 11 men who died on April 20 worked for the company. number of the mistakes made on the rig can be directly traced to Transocean personnel, including inadequate monitoring of the Macondo well for problems during the temporary abandonment procedures and failure to divert the mud and gas away from the rig during the first few minutes of the blowout. Project Crisis Management The effort and resources needed to contain and control the blowout of the Macondo well were unprecedented. From April 20, 2010, the day the well blew out, until September 19, 2010, when the government finally declared it dead, BP expended enormous resources to develop and deploy new technologies that eventually captured a substantial amount of oil at the wellhead and, after 87 days, stopped the flow of oil into the Gulf of Mexico. The government organized a team of scientists and engineers, who took a crash course in petroleum engineering and, over time, were able to provide oversight of BP, in combination with the Coast Guard and the Minerals Management Service (MMS). BP had to construct novel devices, and the government had to mobilize personnel on the fly, because neither was ready for a disaster of this nature in such ocean depths. BP initially underestimated the scale of the disaster and overestimated their ability to address it. Therefore, there was little action in the days following the accident that resembled crisis management. Two days after the explosion, BP had mobilized a mere 32 vessels and 4 aircraft. To be in full response capacity, BP needed 205 times the number of vessels and 32 times the number of aircraft initially deployed. It took until nearly Day 80 before BP was a full response capacity. http://strategicppm. wordpress. com/2010/08/03/bps-project-management-of-the-deepwater-disaster/ This understated reaction was driven by the belief that the well was only leaking 5,000 barrels a day. In reality, the well was leaking ten times that amount. At day 31, the government established a public underwater feed and panel of experts to analyze the flow rate. This resulted in all parties becoming fully aware as of the amount of oil leaking from the well and the response effort of BP and the US government continued to increase. BP immediately focused on repairing the failed the blowout preventer for the first ten days after the explosion. BP did not have planned alternatives to address the incident of a blown out well. Therefore, when the blowout preventer could not be repaired, BP had to develop alternate solutions. These solutions were explored sequentially,  rather than in parallel, which caused further delay. The exception to that was the digging of relief wells which take several months to complete. BP did not have any alternate solutions prepared and developed in advance to be deployed immediately during a time of crisis. The facts indicate that BP didn’t understand (or didn’t want to understand) the scale of the project it was involved in. Government Response Failure The failure of the US federal government to react to the Deepwater disaster is comprised of two components- pre-disaster regulatory efforts and post disaster readiness and response preparedness. First, the government organizations which were tasked to regulate the oil industry for safety compliance were not doing their jobs. The Minerals Management Service (MMS) was responsible for approving the disaster plans of the oil companies as well as regulating their actions in the environment with the Environmental Protection Agency. It is now evident that MMS failed miserably in the oversight of the offshore oil industry. The agency’s resources did not keep pace with the oil industry’s expansion into deeper waters and reliance on more demanding technologies. As a result, MMS was not familiar with many of the technologies presented by oil companies and as a result it frequently relented to a lower number of required tests including testing on blow out preventers. Ironically, BP did have an Oil Spill Response Plan for the Gulf of Mexico applicable to the Macondo well in the MMSfiles. The plan identified three different worst-case scenarios that ranged from 28,033 to 250,000 barrels of oil discharge and used identical language to analyze the shoreline impacts under each scenario. Five of the pages were copied from material on NOAA websites and as a result were not specific to the Gulf of Mexico region. As a result, the BP Oil Spill Response Plan described biological resources nonexistent in the Gulf—including sea lions, sea otters, and walruses. Even more troubling, the MMS Gulf of Mexico Regional Office approved the BP plan without additional analysis. There is little evidence that MMS or BP gave any scrutiny to the contents of the Oil Spill Response Plan submitted. However, the MMS Regional Office did adhere to the timeline to review and approve oil-spill response plans within 30 days of their receipt. This lack of emphasis on the content of the response plan surely contributed to the lack of planning on both the part of the government and BP. As a result, when the disaster struck the MMS and the US federal government reacted slowly to the event. For the first couple of weeks the government barely reacted as it thought BP was more prepared and capable to deal with the spill. When it became evident that BP was coming up with solutions on a day to day basis, the government became more involved with the process. MMS was disbanded 19 days into the disaster. The government continued to work with BP and the other parties to find solutions to killing the well as well as manage the economic impact the disaster was having on the Gulf states. All in all it can be assessed that the US federal government was even less prepared than BP itself. Conclusion Based on the mindset and common practices, it was only a matter of time for this kind of accident to occur within the oil industry. An accident, and certainly any disaster, can be considered as a disruptive event. After a disruptive event, anything and everything can change, with serious repercussions. Many disruptive events can be both predicted and planned for. This should be a major element of the risk planning associated with major programs and projects. And disruptive events can have unexpected and significant consequences – in this case, enormous impact on the environment, BP market valuation, BP’s public image and credibility, many other BP projects and people, public perception of both BP and the oil industry itself, and possibly BP survival. The lessons learned from the Deepwater Horizon project disaster and the BP Oil Spill will continue to influence the regulation of the oil industry into the future. BP learned that adequate project planning and risk management analysis is essential in the event of a project failure. Additionally, a crisis management plan for an unplanned disaster should always be in place prior to any possibility of occurrence. BP’s $500 million oil prospect development project became a crisis management project which has cost over $100 billion to date. BP will continue to struggle with its public relations image as well as continue to deal with endless lawsuits and environmental and economic claims into the future. BP’s lack of planning, lack of risk management analysis and lack of a crisis management plan in the face of project failure could have resulted in the demise of the company altogether. The Deepwater incident will continue to serve as an example to project managers everywhere that the basic concepts of project management should never be neglected, even when you are one of the largest companies in the world. - Bibliography â€Å"BP’s Project Management of the  Deepwater  Disaster† StrategicPPM. com. 3 August 2010. 28 May 2011 http://strategicppm. wordpress. com/2010/08/03/bps-project-management-of-the-deepwater-disaster/ Cavnar, Bob. Disaster on the Horizon: High Stakes, High Risks, and the Story Behind the Deepwater Well Blowout. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company, 2010. Kuzmeski, Maribeth. â€Å"Pinpointing BP’s Pitfalls: Eight Ways to Reconnect After a Disaster† PM World Today, Vol. XII Issue VII July 2010. 28 May 2011 http://www. pmworldtoday. net/tips/2010/july/Pinpointing-BP-Pitfalls. html Lepsinger, Rick. â€Å"Execution Meltdown: Four Key Failures That Sank BP. † . † PM World Today, Vol. XII Issue VIII August 2010. 28 May 2011 http://www. pmworldtoday. net/tips/2010/aug/Execution-Meltdown. html Maltzman, Rich, et al. â€Å"Green Project Management and the BP Deepwater Horizon Spill. † PM World Today, Vol. XII Issue IX- September 2010. 28 May